Science: Natural Sciences
Subcategory of: ScienceTop episodes in Science: Natural Sciences
If you want to think sharper, feel stronger, and perform better — visit www.tonum.com/IMPOSSIBLE and use code IMPOSSIBLE for 10% off your first order. Try Shortform, the invaluable app that helps me prepare for every conversation I have! Get $50 off the annual plan at https://shortform.com/impossible Today, I'm speakin
(Rebroadcast) Noam Chomsky | Prescient Predictions? | Trump, Brazil, and American Fear
This week, I’m excited to share a special rebroadcast from the Origins Podcast archives: my original Origins Podcast conversation with Noam Chomsky. We recorded this dialog over six years ago, as an update to a conversation we’d held three years prior , before the political upheavals of Trump and Brexit. Listening back
Avi Loeb Fights Back: Response to Brian Cox & the 3I/ATLAS Critics
Become a channel member to ask questions! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb returns to break down the newest data on 3I/ATLAS, the interstellar object captivating the world — and triggering fierce debate among scientists. In this extended conversation, Loeb re
Krauss: “DESI Is Wrong: Dark Energy Isn’t Changing”
Please join my mailing list here 👉 https://briankeating.com/list to win a meteorite 💥 Is hype culture killing science? In this episode of Into the Impossible, I welcome back physicist Lawrence Krauss for a candid conversation on hype, being wrong, and the impact of AI on the field of physics. Krauss is a theoretical
Charles Murray: Why I'm Taking Religion Seriously
Michael Shermer sits down with Charles Murray (author of The Bell Curve, Coming Apart, and now Taking Religion Seriously) for a riveting 100-minute conversation about Murray's late-life turn from Harvard-bred agnosticism ("Smart people don't believe that stuff anymore") to Bayesian theism ("I put the afterlife at just
Matthew Ehret, an author and journalist, discusses his works and his perspectives on global warming, suggesting it's based on faulty science and used for political manipulation by oligarchs desiring a neo-feudal society. He critiques figures like Mark Carney and the broader economic and political systems, outlining his